ICTlogy

Anderson, A.A. (2006). The Community Builder's Approach to Theory of Change. A practical guide to theory development. New York: The Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change.

Associació Catalana de Gestió Pública & ESADE (2003). Repensar el paper del gestor públic en el segle XXI. Actes del I Congrés Català de Gestió Pública. Barcelona, 26 i 27 de setembre de 2002. Materials, 19. Barcelona: Escola d'Administració Pública de Catalunya. Retrieved December 03, 2023 from https://eapc.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/publicacions/col_leccio_materials/19_repensar_el_paper_del_sector_public_en_el_segle_xxi_actes_del_i_congres_cat/19_materials_i_congres_gp.pdf

Associació Catalana de Gestió Pública & Escola d'Administració Pública de Catalunya (2008). Reflexió > Acció > Valor públic. Actes del II Congrés Català de Gestió Pública. Materials, 23. Barcelona: Escola d'Administració Pública de Catalunya. Retrieved December 03, 2023 from https://eapc.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/publicacions/col_leccio_materials/23._reflexi____acci____valor_p_blic/CD-sencer-BAIXA.pdf

Barbrook-Johnson, P. & Penn, A.S. (2022). Systems Mapping. How to build and use causal models of systems. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved March 03, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01919-7

Blamey, A. & Mackenzie, M. (2007). “Theories of Change and Realistic Evaluation”. In Evaluation, 13 (4), 439-455. London: SAGE Publications. Retrieved March 09, 2018 from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1356389007082129

Brest, P. (2000). “The Power of Theories of Change”. In Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring 2000, 47-51. Palo Alto: Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society. Retrieved March 09, 2018 from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_power_of_theories_of_change

Brouwer, H., Woodhill, J., Hemmati, M., Verhoosel, K. & van Vugt, S. (2016). The MSP Guide. How to design and facilitate multi-stakeholder partnerships. 3rd edition. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research, WCDI, and Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing. Retrieved December 16, 2021 from http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/9781780446691

Brouwer, H. & Brouwers, J. (2017). The MSP Tool Guide. Sixty tools to facilitate multi-stakeholder partnerships. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research, WCDI, and Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing. Retrieved December 16, 2021 from https://mspguide.org/the-msp-tool-guide/

Brugnach, M., Dewulf, A., Pahl-Wostl, C. & Taillieu, T. (2008). “Toward a Relational Concept of Uncertainty: about Knowing Too Little, Knowing Too Differently, and Accepting Not to Know”. In Ecology & Society, 13 (2). Dedham: Resilience Alliance. Retrieved April 27, 2024 from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art30/

Brugué Torruella, Q., Canal, R. & Payà, P. (2010). Transversalidad en los proyectos locales: de la teoría a la práctica. Informe Kaleidos. Bellaterra: IGOP, Kaleidos.

Brugué Torruella, Q., Canal, R. & Payà, P. (2010). “¿Inteligencia administrativa para abordar “problemas malditos”? El caso de las comisiones interdepartamentales”. In Gestión y Política Pública, 24 (1), 85-130. Ciudad de México: CIDE. Retrieved December 04, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.29265/gypp.v24i1.97

Brugué Torruella, Q. (2022). Organizaciones que saben, organizaciones que aprenden. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.

Bryson, J.M., Crosby, B.C. & Bloomberg, L. (2014). “Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management”. In Public Administration Review, 74 (1), 445-456. Indianapolis: Wiley, American Society for Public Administration. Retrieved May 06, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238

Carson, L. (2018). Framing the Remit. Sydney: The newDemocracy Foundation. Retrieved June 11, 2020 from https://newdemocracy.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/docs_researchnotes_2018_July_RampD_Note_-_Framing_the_Remit.pdf

Col·legi d'Economistes de Catalunya (Ed.) (2018). El sector públic a la Catalunya del futur. 3r Congrés d'Economia i Empresa de Catalunya. Cap a un model eficient i equitatiu. Barcelona: Col·legi d'Economistes de Catalunya. Retrieved October 18, 2024 from https://www.coleconomistes.cat/MAILS/DOCS/6_Web_EIX6.pdf

Connell, J.P., Kubisch, A.C., Schorr, L.B. & Weiss, C.H. (Eds.) (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, Methods and Contexts. Queenstown: Aspen Institute.

Connell, J.P. & Kubisch, A.C. (1998). “Applying a Theory of Change Approach to the Evaluation of Comprehensive Community Initiatives: Progress, Prospects, and Problems”. In Fullbright-Anderson, K., Kubisch, A.C. & Connell, J.P. (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Theory, measurement, and analysis. Volume 2. Queenstown: Aspen Institute.

Cortés Abad, Ó. (2024). “Situación de la dirección pública profesional en España. Análisis comparado en el sector público estatal y autonómico”. In Documentación Administrativa, (12), 8-27. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública. Retrieved January 15, 2022 from https://doi.org/10.24965/da.11386

Cortés Carreres, J.V. (2021). “Carrera horizontal y evaluación del desempeño”. In Cantero Martínez, J. (Coord.), Continuidad versus transformación: ¿qué función pública necesita España?, Capítulo 14, 401-446. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.

Cox, J. (2020). Systems change in local government: learning from COVID-19. London: Nesta. Retrieved September 28, 2020 from https://www.nesta.org.uk/project-updates/change-in-local-government-learning-from-covid-19/

Crosby, B.C., 't Hart, P. & Torfing, J. (2019). “Public value creation through collaborative innovation”. In Public Management Review, 19 (5). London: Routledge. Retrieved May 06, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165

Cuenca Cervera, J.J. (2021). “Evaluar el desempeño mediante un enfoque de objetivos. Una aplicación práctica”. In Cantero Martínez, J. (Coord.), Continuidad versus transformación: ¿qué función pública necesita España?, Capítulo 12, 343-372. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.

Denhardt, R.B. & Denhardt, J.V. (2000). “The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering”. In Public Administration Review, 60 (6), 549-559. Indianapolis: Wiley, American Society for Public Administration. Retrieved November 08, 2023 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/977437

Design Council (2021). Beyond Net Zero. A Systemic Design Approach. London: Design Council. Retrieved February 07, 2022 from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/Beyond Net Zero - A Systemic Design Approach.pdf

Dunleavy, P. & Margetts, H. (2024). “Data science, artificial intelligence and the third wave of digital era governance”. In Public Policy and Administration, First published online August 14, 2024. London: SAGE Publications. Retrieved December 16, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231198737

Durham, E., Baker, H., Smith, M., Moore, E. & Morgan, V. (2014). The BiodivERsA Stakeholder Engagement Handbook. Paris: BiodivERsA. Retrieved October 24, 2021 from https://www.biodiversa.org/705/download

Earl, S., Carden, F. & Smutylo, T. (2017). Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs. Ottawa: IDRC. Retrieved September 18, 2020 from https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/outcome-mapping-building-learning-and-reflection-development-programs

Echegaray Eizaguirre, L., Urbano Ortega, I. & Barrutieta Anduiza, G. (2017). Design Thinking. Un modelo para la aplicación en la Administración Pública. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública. Retrieved March 04, 2022 from https://www.inap.es/documents/10136/1716773/PagInicia-Design-Thinking.pdf/df875815-f503-57aa-1f56-28ccf46bcd07

European Commission & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union – A problem-solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved March 26, 2024 from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/360325

European Commission, Chicot, J., Kuittinen, H. & Lykogianni, E. (2018). Mission-oriented research and innovation – Assessing the impact of a mission-oriented research and innovation approach – Final report. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved March 26, 2024 from https://op.europa.eu/o/opportal-service/download-handler?identifier=3b46ce3f-5338-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1&format=pdf&language=en&productionSystem=cellar&part=

European Commission, Türk, A., Arrilucea, E. & Kristensen, F.S. (2018). Mission-oriented research and innovation – Inventory and characterisation of initiatives – Final report. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved March 26, 2024 from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/373448

European Commission & Mazzucato, M. (2019). Governing Missions in the European Union. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved March 26, 2024 from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/618697

Font i Llovet, T., Barrero Rodríguez, C., Díez Sastre, S., Galindo Caldés, R., Rivero Ortega, R., Solé Vilanova, J. & Vilalta Reixach, M. (2023). Repensar el govern local: perspectives actuals. Col·lecció Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern, 16. Barcelona: Institut d'Estudis d'Autogovern. Retrieved July 01, 2023 from https://presidencia.gencat.cat/web/.content/ambits_actuacio/desenvolupament_autogovern/iea/publicacions/01_IEAg/IEAg_arxius-i-vincles/IEAG_16_web.pdf

Generalitat de Catalunya (2005). Llibre Blanc de la Funció Pública Catalana. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Retrieved May 29, 2021 from http://eapc.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/publicacions/varia/20._llibre_blanc_de_la_funci__p_blica_catalana/Llibre-Blanc-Complet.pdf

Gorriti Bontigui, M. (2018). “Innovar en selección desde la evidencia empírica y las nuevas competencias”. In Revista Vasca de Gestión de Personas y Organizaciones Públicas, Número especial 2, Procesos selectivos, 66-85. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública.

Gorriti Bontigui, M. (2024). “La carrera horizontal en las administraciones públicas desde los recursos humanos: el job crafting”. In Revista Vasca de Gestión de Personas y Organizaciones Públicas, (27), 8-25. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública. Retrieved December 27, 0202 from https://doi.org/10.47623/ivap-rvgp.27.2024.01

Gorriti Bontigui, M. (2024). “La planificación estratégica de recursos humanos en las Administraciones públicas españolas del siglo XXI”. In Documentación Administrativa, (13), 10–32. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública. Retrieved December 04, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.24965/da.11429

Goulden, A. & Kattel, R. (2022). Designing and implementing mission-oriented policies: Tools and resources from the field. London: UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Retrieved April 26, 2024 from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/publications/2024/feb/designing-and-implementing-mission-oriented-policies

Grantcraft (2006). Mapping Change. Using a Theory of Change to Guide Planning and Evaluation. New York: Grantcraft. Retrieved December 03, 2018 from http://www.grantcraft.org/assets/content/resources/theory_change.pdf

Greenway, A. & Loosemore, T. (2015). The Radical How. London: UK 2040 Options Nesta, Public Digital. Retrieved April 28, 2024 from https://options2040.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/The-Radical-How.pdf

Hartley, J. (2005). “Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present”. In Public Money & Management, 25 (1), 27-34. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. Retrieved June 28, 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x

Hartley, J., Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2013). “Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship”. In Public Administration Review, 73 (6), 821-830. Indianapolis: Wiley, American Society for Public Administration. Retrieved September 01, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136

International Development Research Center (2017). The Research Quality Plus (RQ+) assessment instrument. Ottawa: IDRC. Retrieved December 06, 2018 from https://www.idrc.ca/sites/default/files/sp/Documents%20EN/idrc_rq_assessment_instrument_september_2017.pdf

Keane, T., Caffin, B., Soto, M., Chauhan, A., Krishnaswamy, R., Van Dijk, G. & Wadhawan, M. (2014). DIY Toolkit. Development Impact & You. Practical tools to trigger & support social innovation. London: Nesta. Retrieved May 20, 2022 from https://diytoolkit.org/

Kelly, G., Mulgan, G. & Muers, S. (2002). Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform. Discussion paper prepared for the Cabinet Office Strategy Unit, United Kingdom. London: Strategy Unit, UK Cabinet Office.

Krogh, A.H. & Triantafillou, P. (2024). “Developing New Public Governance as a public management reform model”. In Public Management Review, 26 (10), 3040–3056. London: Routledge. Retrieved February 07, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2313539

Liyanage, H. (2009). Theory of change. Impact assessment. Colombo: Sarvodaya – Fusion,. Retrieved December 23, 2009 from http://harshaliyanage.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/theory-of-change.pdf

Mapelli Marchena, C. (2021). “Experiencias comparadas para abordar procesos de cambio en el empleo público”. In Cantero Martínez, J. (Coord.), Continuidad versus transformación: ¿qué función pública necesita España?, Capítulo 2, 37-62. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.

Martí-Costa, M., Barres, R. & Termes, A. (2020). La governança de l’emergència complexa: la covid-19. Actuacions, adaptació organitzativa i innovacions de l’Ajuntament de Barcelona. Barcelona: IERM, Ajuntament de Barcelona. Retrieved February 11, 2024 from http://hdl.handle.net/11703/122612

Mazzucato, M. (2017). Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Working Paper Series (IIPP WP 2017-01). London: UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Retrieved November 24, 2023 from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2017-01

Mazzucato, M. & Ryan-Collins, J. (2022). “Putting value creation back into “public value”: from market-fixing to market-shaping”. In Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 25 (4), 345-360. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. Retrieved September 29, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2022.2053537

Mazzucato, M. (2023). Governing the economics of the common good: from correcting market failures to shaping collective goals. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Working Paper Series (IIPP WP 2023-08). London: UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Retrieved June 30, 2024 from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2023-08

McLean, R., Ofir, Z., Etherington, A., Acevedo, M. & Feinstein, O. (2022). RQ+. Research Quality Plus. Evaluating Research Differently. Ottawa: IDRC. Retrieved April 25, 2022 from https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/60945/IDL-60945.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

Meadows, D.H. (2009). Thinking in Systems. A Primer. Abingdon: Earthscan.

Mikkelsen, K.H. & Røiseland, A. (2024). “Managing portfolios of Co-creation projects in the public sector organization”. In Public Management Review, Published online: 30 May 2024. London: Routledge. Retrieved June 01, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2360028

Monteiro, B. & Dal Borgo, R. (2023). Supporting decision making with strategic foresight: An emerging framework for proactive and prospective governments. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 63. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved April 23, 2024 from https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/1d78c791-en

Mulgan, G. (2024). Strategies, missions and the challenge of whole of government action. London: Geoff Mulgan. Retrieved April 20, 2024 from https://download-files.wixmp.com/ugd/0dd0d2_112362356c284305af2fa1a100895a61.pdf?token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJ1cm46YXBwOmU2NjYzMGU3MTRmMDQ5MGFhZWExZjE0OWIzYjY5ZTMyIiwic3ViIjoidXJuOmFwcDplNjY2MzBlNzE0ZjA0OTBhYWVhMWYxNDliM2I2OWUzMiIsImF1ZCI6WyJ1cm46c2VydmljZTpmaWxlLmRvd25sb2FkIl0sImlhdCI6MTcxNDU1NDY4MywiZXhwIjoxNzE0NTkwNjkzLCJqdGkiOiJkYjhkZjhiMy01NWZjLTRmY2ItODMzMy1mNDY1MDhk

Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: NESTA. Retrieved February 23, 2010 from https://www.nesta.org.uk/documents/53/the_open_book_of_social_innovation.pdf

Nesta (2016). UK Evidence Ecosystem for Social Policy. February 2016. London: Nesta. Retrieved October 16, 2021 from https://evaluationsupportscotland.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Alliance_info_graphic5.pdf

Nguyen, H., Drejer, I. & Marquès, P. (2024). “Citizen engagement in public sector innovation: exploring the transition between paradigms”. In Public Management Review, Published online: 04 May 2024. London: Routledge. Retrieved February 07, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2347360

OECD (2017). Skills for a High Performing Civil Service. OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved July 02, 2021 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264280724-en

OECD (2020). Improving Governance with Policy Evaluation. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved June 18, 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1787/89b1577d-en

OECD (2020). Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved June 11, 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en

OECD (2021). The design and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies. A new systemic policy approach to address societal challenges. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 100. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved March 26, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1787/23074957

OECD (2021). The OECD Framework for digital talent and skills in the public sector. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 45. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved December 06, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1787/4e7c3f58-en

OECD (2023). The Principles of Public Administration. 2023 edition. Paris: OECD. Retrieved October 29, 2023 from https://www.sigmaweb.org/publications/Principles-of-Public-Administration-2023.pdf

Ofir, Z., Schwandt, T., Duggan, C. & McLean, R. (2016). RQ+. Research Quality Plus. A Holistic Approach to Evaluating Research. Ottawa: IDRC. Retrieved December 06, 2018 from https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/56528/IDL-56528.pdf

Omidyar Group (2017). Systems Practice. Redwood City: The Omidyar Group. Retrieved August 01, 2019 from https://docs.kumu.io/content/Workbook-012617.pdf

Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading: William Patrick.

Osborne, S.P. (Ed.) (2010). The New Public Governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London: Routledge.

Peach, K., Berditchevskaia, A. & Bass, T. (2020). Collective Intelligence Design Playbook. (beta). London: Nesta. Retrieved January 13, 2023 from https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Nesta_Playbook_001_Web.pdf

Peña-López, I. (2014). “Innovació social oberta: l’organització política com a plataforma”. In Costa i Fernández, L. & Puntí Brun, M. (Eds.), Comunicació pel canvi social. Reflexions i experiències per una comunicació participativa, emancipadora i transparent, 59-75. Girona: Documenta Universitaria.

Peña-López, I. (2018). “Fomento de la participación democrática no formal e informal. De la democracia de masas a las redes de la democracia”. In Laboratorio de Aragón Gobierno Abierto (Ed.), Abrir instituciones desde dentro. Hacking Inside Black Book, Capítulo 11, 113-124. Zaragoza: LAAAB, Gobierno de Aragón. Retrieved December 11, 2018 from http://www.laaab.es/hackinginside/assets/chapters/CAPITULO11.pdf

Peña-López, I. (2019). “L’Estat com a plataforma: la participació ciutadana per la preservació de l’Estat com a bé comú”. In Nota d'Economia, 105, 193-208. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Retrieved November 15, 2019 from http://economia.gencat.cat/web/.content/70_economia_catalana/arxius/publicacions_periodiques/nota_d_economia/ne-105/NE-105-c14.pdf

Peña-López, I. (2019). Shifting participation into sovereignty: the case of decidim.barcelona. Barcelona: Huygens Editorial.

Peña-López, I. (2020). “El ecosistema de gobernanza pública: las instituciones como infraestructuras abiertas para la toma de decisiones colectivas”. In Reniu i Vilamala, J.M. & Meseguer, J.V. (Eds.), ¿Política confinada? Nuevas tecnologías y toma de decisiones en un contexto de pandemia, Capítulo 2, 53-71. Cizur Menor: Thompson-Reuters/Aranzadi.

Peña-López, I. (2023). “La gestión integral del talento en la Administración centrada en la política pública de impacto”. In Gairín Sallán, J. & López-Crespo, S. (Coords.), Aprendizaje e inteligencia colectiva en las organizaciones después de la pandemia, Capítulo 3.2, 131-137. Comunicación en el Simposio "De la función pública al Servicio público: hacia un nuevo modelo de aprendizaje y desarrollo" del VII Congreso Internacional EDO 2023, 18/05/2023. Madrid: Praxis-La Ley.

Peña-López, I. (2023). “Managing complexity for systemic impact: responses to VUCA and BANI environments”. In ICTlogy, 22 August 2023. Barcelona: ICTlogy. Retrieved August 22, 2023 from https://ictlogy.net/review/?p=4810

Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.

Ramia, I., Powell, A., Stratton, K., Stokes, C., Meltzer, A. & Muir, K. (2021). Roadmap to social impact: Your step-by-step guide to planning, measuring and communicating social impact. Sydney: The Centre for Social Impact. Retrieved September 11, 2021 from https://www.csi.edu.au/media/uploads/csi_roadmap_to_social_impact.pdf

Ramió Matas, C. (2021). “El modelo anticuado y fragmentado de la Función Pública en España: algunas propuestas”. In Cantero Martínez, J. (Coord.), Continuidad versus transformación: ¿qué función pública necesita España?, Capítulo 5, 125-154. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.

Ramos, J., Sweeney, J.A., Peach, K. & Smith, L. (2020). Our futures: by the people, for the people. How mass involvement in shaping the future can solve complex problems. London: Nesta. Retrieved July 08, 2020 from https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Our_futures_by_the_people_for_the_people_WEB_v5.pdf

Ravetz, J.R. (1999). “What is Post-Normal Science”. In Futures, 31 (7), 647-653. London: Elsevier. Retrieved May 05, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00024-5

Saltelli, A. & Funtowicz, S. (2017). “What is science’s crisis really about?”. In Futures, 91 (1), 5-11. London: Elsevier. Retrieved May 05, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.010

Schwendinger, F., Topp, L. & Kovacs, V. (2022). Competences for Policymaking — Competence Frameworks for Policymakers and Researchers working on Public Policy. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved December 11, 2024 from http://doi.org/10.2760/642121

Sellick, V. (2019). 20 Tools for Innovating in Government. London: Nesta. Retrieved April 18, 2022 from https://www.nesta.org.uk/documents/2436/20_Tools_Innovating_Government_RCB1Iuj.pdf

Siebers, V. & Torfing, J. (2018). “Co-creation as a new form of citizen engagement: Comparing Danish and Dutch experiences at the local government level”. In International Public Management Review, 18 (1/2), 187-208. Phoenix: Arizona State University. Retrieved September 06, 2024 from https://ipmr.net/index.php/ipmr/article/view/335

Start, D. & Hovland, I. (2004). Tools for Policy Impact: A Handbook for Researchers. London: Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved January 05, 2019 from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/194.pdf

Stein, D. & Valters, C. (2012). Understanding Theory of Change in International Development. London: JSRP, The Asia Foundation.

Stoker, G. (2006). “Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance?”. In American Review of Public Administration, 36 (1), 41-27. London: SAGE Publications. Retrieved September 29, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583

Tõnurist, P. & Hanson, A. (2020). Anticipatory innovation governance: Shaping the future through proactive policy making. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 44. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved April 23, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1787/cce14d80-en

Torfing, J. & Triantafillou, P. (2013). “What’s in a Name? Grasping New Public Governance as a Political-Administrative System”. In International Review of Public Administration, 18 (2), 9-25. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. Retrieved June 23, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2013.10805250

Torfing, J. (2019). “Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument”. In Public Management Review, 21 (1), 1-11. London: Routledge. Retrieved September 01, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248

Torfing, J., Sørensen, E. & Røiseland, A. (2019). “Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward”. In Administration & Society, 51 (5), 795– 825. London: SAGE Publications. Retrieved May 05, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057

UK Government Office for Science (2022). Systems thinking: An Introductory Toolkit for Civil Servants. London: Government of the UK. Retrieved September 08, 2023 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6290d241d3bf7f036cb7a09f/GO-Science_Systems_Thinking_Toolkit_2022_v1.0.pdf

UK Government Office for Science (2023). An introductory systems thinking toolkit for civil servants. Updated 12 January 2023. London: Government of the UK. Retrieved September 08, 2023 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/systems-thinking-for-civil-servants/toolkit

UK Government Office for Science (2023). Systems thinking case study bank. Updated 12 January 2023. London: Government of the UK. Retrieved September 08, 2023 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/systems-thinking-for-civil-servants/case-studies

UK Government Office for Science (2023). The civil servant's systems thinking journey. Updated 12 January 2023. London: Government of the UK. Retrieved September 08, 2023 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/systems-thinking-for-civil-servants/journey

UK Government Office for Science (2024). The Futures Toolkit. A set of tools to help you develop policies and strategies that are robust in the face of an uncertain future. 2024 version. London: Government of the UK. Retrieved December 01, 2024 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66c4493f057d859c0e8fa778/futures-toolkit-edition-2.pdf

UNDP (2022). System Change: A Guidebook for Adopting Portfolio Approaches. Bangkok: UNDP. Retrieved August 18, 2023 from https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2022-03/UNDP-RBAP-System-Change-A-Guidebook-for-Adopting-Portfolio-Approaches-2022.pdf

UNDP & Agirre Lehendakaria Center (2023). Listening to the Present, Designining the Future: A Guide to Deep Listening. Bangkok: UNDP. Retrieved August 18, 2023 from https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2023-03/UNDP-RBAP-SIP-Deep-Listening-Guide-2023.pdf

UNDP (2023). Portfolio approach. Rethinking policy & development in times of uncertainty. Bangkok: UNDP. Retrieved September 07, 2023 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mOVog1-sNhb8OI1j2wffoDOCYYIdoI4G/view

UNDP (2023). UNDP Portfolio Approach Competency Framework. Bangkok: UNDP. Retrieved August 18, 2023 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1epEJ29znNRVPYzyv7uHBINOrbJsmeEUa/view

UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence (2018). Foresight Manual. Empowered Futures for the 2030 Agenda. Singapore: UNDP.

van der Heijden, K. (1997). “Scenarios, Strategy, and the Strategy Process”. In Presearch. Provoking strategic conversation, 1 (1). Emeryville: Global Business Network.

Vogel, I. (2012). Review of the use of ‘Theory of Change’ in international development. London: DFID. Retrieved March 09, 2018 from http://www.theoryofchange.org/pdf/DFID_ToC_Review_VogelV7.pdf

Wittmann, F., Lindner, R., Hufnagl, M. & Roth, F. (2022). Mission-oriented innovation policy for transformative change. A toolbox for implementation and impact assessment. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems. Retrieved April 26, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.24406/publica-587

Wittmann, F., Hummler, A., Posch, D. & Lindner, R. (2024). Missions with Impact. A practical guide to formulating effective missions. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems. Retrieved June 05, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.11585/2024034