Category: Research & Methodologies
Works
140 references:
Abad Esteve, F. & Àlvarez Ramos, C. (2019). “Abandono universitario: revisión del tipo, del cálculo y de su alcance”. In
Revista Índice, (73), 32-35. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Retrieved March 13, 2021 from http://www.revistaindice.com/numero73/p32.pdf [e]
Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum . Tallinn: Estonian Association for the History and Philosophy of Science. Retrieved June 27, 2019 from http://www.bahps.org/acta-baltica [e]
Action for the Rights of Children (2001). Facilitator's Toolkit. Geneva: ARC, Reach Out. Retrieved December 19, 2021 from http://www.unhcr.org/4371d7c92.pdf [143] [e]
Aguado Peláez, D. & Martínez García, P. (2018). Guía de evaluación. Herramientas prácticas para la evaluación de políticas de participación del Ayuntamiento de Pamplona. Pamplona: Ayuntamiento de Pamplona. Retrieved March 23, 2020 from http://participa.pamplona.es/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/11/GUIA_EVALUACION.pdf [133] [e]
Aguirre Ulloa, M. (2020). Transforming public organizations into co-designing cultures: a study of capacity-building programs as learning ecosystems. Oslo: Arkitektur- og designhøgskolen i Oslo. Retrieved January 03, 2023 from https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2654789 [e]
Anderson, A.A. (2006). The Community Builder's Approach to Theory of Change. A practical guide to theory development. New York: The Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change. [152] [e]
Bacchi, C. & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural Policy Analysis. A Guide to Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [e]
Barbrook-Johnson, P. & Penn, A.S. (2022). Systems Mapping. How to build and use causal models of systems. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved March 03, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01919-7 [152] [e]
Belcher, B.M., Davel, R. & Claus, R. (2020). “A refined method for theory-based evaluation of the societal impacts of research”. In
MethodsX, 7. London: Elsevier. Retrieved June 06, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.100788 [e]
Blamey, A. & Mackenzie, M. (2007). “Theories of Change and Realistic Evaluation”. In
Evaluation, 13 (4), 439-455. London: SAGE Publications. Retrieved March 09, 2018 from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1356389007082129 [152] [e]
Blasco, J. (2009). Avaluació del disseny. Guia pràctica 3. Col·lecció Ivàlua de guies pràctiques sobre avaluació de polítiques públiques. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved February 27, 2018 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2019-10/16_02_2010_10_23_20_Guia3_Disseny_Juliol2009_final.pdf [142]
[147]
[e]
Box, G.E., Jenkins, G.M. & Reinsel, G.C. (2008). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. 4th Edition. Indianapolis: John Wiley and Sons. [88] [e]
Brest, P. (2000). “The Power of Theories of Change”. In
Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring 2000, 47-51. Palo Alto: Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society. Retrieved March 09, 2018 from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_power_of_theories_of_change [152] [e]
Callon, M. (1984). “Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay”. In
The Sociological Review, Monograph by J. Law: Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge?, 32, 196-223. London: SAGE Publications. Retrieved August 24, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x [e]
Casado, D. (2009). Avaluació de necessitats socials. Guia pràctica 2. Col·lecció Ivàlua de guies pràctiques sobre avaluació de polítiques públiques. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved February 27, 2018 from https://www.ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2019-10/05_03_2010_12_45_15_Guia2_Necessitats_Juny2009_final.pdf [142] [e]
Casillas, C., García, L., Macía, M. & Rico, J. (2020). Guía de evaluabilidad de intervenciones públicas. Informe final. Madrid: AEVAL. Retrieved April 01, 2023 from https://funcionpublica.hacienda.gob.es/dam/es/portalsefp/evaluacion-politicas-publicas/Documentos/Metodologias/Guia_Evaluabilidad_Intervenciones_Publicas.pdf [142] [e]
Casillas, C., Hernández, L., Macía, M. & Paja, M. (2016). Metodología de evaluación y seguimiento de la transparencia de la actividad pública. Informe final. Madrid: AEVAL. Retrieved February 27, 2018 from https://www.mptfp.gob.es/dam/es/portal/funcionpublica/evaluacion-politicas-publicas/Documentos/Metodologias/Guia4.pdf [142] [e]
Casillas, C., Hernández, L., Macía, M. & Paja, M. (2016). Metodología de evaluación y seguimiento de la transparencia de la actividad pública. Anexos. Madrid: AEVAL. Retrieved February 27, 2018 from https://www.mptfp.gob.es/dam/es/portal/funcionpublica/evaluacion-politicas-publicas/Documentos/Metodologias/Guia4_2.pdf [142] [e]
CIPPEC (2012). Qué es un plan de incidencia. Por qué planificar. ¿Cómo diseñar un plan de incidencia en políticas públicas? Guía Nº1. Buenos Aires: CIPPEC. Retrieved November 28, 2018 from https://www.cippec.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/1730.pdf [142] [e]
Connell, J.P. & Kubisch, A.C. (1998). “Applying a Theory of Change Approach to the Evaluation of Comprehensive Community Initiatives: Progress, Prospects, and Problems”. In Fullbright-Anderson, K., Kubisch, A.C. & Connell, J.P. (Eds.),
New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Theory, measurement, and analysis. Volume 2. Queenstown: Aspen Institute. [152] [e]
Connell, J.P., Kubisch, A.C., Schorr, L.B. & Weiss, C.H. (Eds.) (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, Methods and Contexts. Queenstown: Aspen Institute. [152] [e]
Cordoncillo Acosta, C., Farré Ribas, M. & Miras Llompart, J. (2020). Com puc avaluar emprant mètodes participatius?. Eina pràctica 3.4.. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved October 10, 2021 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2021-09/Toolkit_Eina%203.4.%20Avaluar%20m%C3%A8todes%20participatius.pdf [133] [e]
Cordoncillo Acosta, C., De Quintana Medina, J., Farré Ribas, M. & Miras Llompart, J. (2020). Com puc incorporar la perspectiva de gènere a l’avaluació?. Eina pràctica 2.2.. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved October 10, 2021 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2021-09/Toolkit_Eina%202.2.%20Com%20puc%20incorporar%20la%20perspectiva%20de%20g%C3%A8nere.pdf [133] [e]
Cordoncillo Acosta, C. (2022). La incorporació de la participació en l’avaluació de polítiques públiques. Guia pràctica 19. Col·lecció Ivàlua de guies pràctiques sobre avaluació de polítiques públiques. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved July 02, 2022 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2022-06/Guia%20Pr%C3%A0ctica%2019_Participaci%C3%B3_Cat_Def.pdf [133]
[134]
[e]
De Quintana Medina, J. (2021). La perspectiva de gènere en l’avaluació de polítiques públiques. Guia pràctica 18. Col·lecció Ivàlua de guies pràctiques sobre avaluació de polítiques públiques. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved December 28, 2021 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/inline-files/Guia%20pr%C3%A0ctica%2018.%20-%20La%20perspectiva%20de%20g%C3%A8nere%20a%20l%E2%80%99avaluaci%C3%B3%20de%20pol%C3%ADtiques%20p%C3%BAbliques%20CAT.pdf [133]
[134]
[e]
Design Council (2021). Beyond Net Zero. A Systemic Design Approach. London: Design Council. Retrieved February 07, 2022 from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/Beyond Net Zero - A Systemic Design Approach.pdf [152] [e]
Donovan, C. & Hanney, S. (2011). “The Payback Framework explained”. In
Research Evaluation, 20 (3), 181–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved June 25, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13118583635756 [e]
Earl, S., Carden, F. & Smutylo, T. (2017). Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs. Ottawa: IDRC. Retrieved September 18, 2020 from https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/outcome-mapping-building-learning-and-reflection-development-programs [152] [e]
Echegaray Eizaguirre, L., Urbano Ortega, I. & Barrutieta Anduiza, G. (2017). Design Thinking. Un modelo para la aplicación en la Administración Pública. Madrid: INAP. [143]
[152]
[e]
Escola d'Administració Pública de Catalunya (2022). Marc competencial per al treball col·laboratiu en recerca i innovació. Eines per als recursos humans, 12. Barcelona: Escola d'Administració Pública de Catalunya. Retrieved November 28, 2022 from https://eapc.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/publicacions/col_leccio_eines_per_als_recursos_humans/12_Marc_competencial_treball_colaboratiu/Eines_12_DEF.pdf [148]
[150]
[151]
[e]
European Commission (2022). Approaches to inclusive gender equality in research and innovation (R&I). Insight Report. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved July 15, 2023 from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/004694 [e]
European Commission & Mazzucato, M. (2019). Governing Missions in the European Union. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved March 26, 2024 from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/618697 [152] [e]
European Commission & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union – A problem-solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved March 26, 2024 from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/360325 [152] [e]
European Commission, Chicot, J., Kuittinen, H. & Lykogianni, E. (2018). Mission-oriented research and innovation – Assessing the impact of a mission-oriented research and innovation approach – Final report. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved March 26, 2024 from https://op.europa.eu/o/opportal-service/download-handler?identifier=3b46ce3f-5338-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1&format=pdf&language=en&productionSystem=cellar&part= [152] [e]
European Commission, Türk, A., Arrilucea, E. & Eagle, S. (2018). Mission-oriented research and innovation – Inventory and characterisation of initiatives – Final report. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved March 26, 2024 from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/373448 [152] [e]
European Commission (2014). Proposed approaches to social impact measurement. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved September 14, 2024 from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/28855 [e]
European Institute for Gender Equality (2016). Gender Equality in Academia and Research. GEAR tool. Brussels: European Institute for Gender Equality. Retrieved December 08, 2018 from https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/mh0716096enn_1.pdf [134] [e]
Evaluation . London: SAGE Publications. Retrieved April 19, 2018 from http://journals.sagepub.com/home/evi [e]
Farré Ribas, M., Martí, N., Miras Llompart, J. & Todeschini, F. (2020). Com puc construir indicadors per a una avaluació?. Eina pràctica 3.2.. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved October 10, 2021 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2021-09/Toolkit_Eina%203.2.%20Indicadors_Def.pdf [133] [e]
Farré Ribas, M., Martí, N., Miras Llompart, J. & Sanz, J. (2020). Com puc dissenyar polítiques basades en evidències?. Eina pràctica 1.2.. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved October 10, 2021 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2021-09/Toolkit_Eina%201.2.%20Disseny%20amb%20evide%CC%80ncia_Def.pdf [133] [e]
Farré Ribas, M., Miras Llompart, J. & Segura, A. (2020). Com puc elaborar un pla d’avaluacions?. Eina pràctica 2.3.. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved October 10, 2021 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2021-09/Toolkit_Eina%202.3.%20Com%20puc%20elaborar%20un%20pla%20d%E2%80%99avaluacions.pdf [133] [e]
Farré Ribas, M., Martí, N., Miras Llompart, J. & Sanz, J. (2020). Com puc elaborar una Teoria del Canvi?. Eina pràctica 1.1.. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved October 10, 2021 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2021-09/Toolkit_Eina%201.1.%20Teoria%20del%20Canvi_Def.pdf [133] [e]
Farré Ribas, M. & Miras Llompart, J. (2021). Com puc encarregar una avaluació?. Eina pràctica 3.1.. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved October 10, 2021 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2021-09/Toolkit_Eina%203.1.%20Com%20puc%20encarregar%20una%20avaluaci%C3%B3_Def.pdf [133] [e]
Farré Ribas, M., Martí, N., Miras Llompart, J. & Sabes-Figuera, R. (2020). Com puc formular bones preguntes d’avaluació?. Eina pràctica 2.1.. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved October 10, 2021 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2021-09/Toolkit_Eina%202.1.%20Preguntes%20Avaluaci%C3%B3_Def.pdf [133] [e]
Farré Ribas, M., Martí, N., Miras Llompart, J. & Sanz, J. (2021). Com puc recollir percepcions i experiències en avaluació?. Eina pràctica 3.3.. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved October 10, 2021 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2021-09/Toolkit_Eina%203.3.%20Percepcions_Def.pdf [131]
[133]
[e]
Fernández, T., Romagosa, M. & Martín-Pardo, M. (2022). Guia per impulsar agendes compartides en el marc de la RIS3CAT 2030. Col·lecció "Monitoratge de la RIS3CAT", número 20, octubre de 2020. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Retrieved October 28, 2022 from https://fonseuropeus.gencat.cat/web/.content/ris3cat/documents/monitoratge/20-guia-agendes-compartides-ris3cat-2030.pdf [e]
Fernández, T. & Romagosa, M. (2020). L'articulació d'agendes compartides per a la sostenibilitat i el canvi social. Una contribució des del territori al debat de la UE sobre les transicions cap a la sostenibilitat. Col·lecció "Monitoratge de la RIS3CAT", número 8, gener de 2020. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Retrieved January 20, 2020 from http://catalunya2020.gencat.cat/web/.content/00_catalunya2020/Documents/estrategies/fitxers/agendes-compartides.pdf [e]
Fernández, T. & Dalmau, F.J. (2023). La lògica de les agendes compartides de la RIS3CAT en un marc de política d'innovació transformativa. Documents de la RIS3CAT, novembre de 2023. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Retrieved May 30, 2024 from https://fonseuropeus.gencat.cat/web/.content/ris3cat/documents/2030/logica-agendes-compartides-ris3cat-politica-innovacio-transformativa.pdf [e]
Fernández, T. & Herrera, À. (2022). Laboratoris d’innovació transformativa i agendes compartides. Col·lecció "Monitoratge de la RIS3CAT", número 18, febrer de 2022. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Retrieved May 30, 2024 from https://fonseuropeus.gencat.cat/web/.content/ris3cat/documents/monitoratge/18-monitoratge-ris3cat-laboratoris-innovacio-transformativa.pdf [e]
Foresight . Bradford: Emerald. Retrieved January 08, 2022 from https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/1463-6689 [e]
Fullbright-Anderson, K., Kubisch, A.C. & Connell, J.P. (Eds.) (1998). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Theory, measurement, and analysis. Volume 2. Queenstown: Aspen Institute. [e]
Fundesplai & CREAF (2020). Ciència ciutadana, natura urbana i educació ambiental. El Prat de Llobregat: Fundesplai. Retrieved January 05, 2021 from https://fundesplai.org/arxius/PDFs/Publicacions/Ciencia_Ciutadana_Natura_Urbana_i_EA-cat.pdf [e]
Galligan, Y. & Clavero, S. (2008). Assessing gender democracy in the European Union. A methodological framework. RECON Online Working Paper 2008/16. Oslo: ARENA. Retrieved December 08, 2018 from http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_0816.pdf?fileitem=50511960 [134] [e]
Garcia Ramilo, C. & Cinco, C. (2005). Gender Evaluation Methodology for Internet and ICTs. A learning tool for change and empowerment. Melville: Association for Progressive Communications. Retrieved December 07, 2018 from https://www.apc.org/sites/default/files/GEM_EN.pdf [134] [e]
Gensana Riera, M.À. (2005). Informes d'impacte de gènere. Col·lecció Eines 1. Barcelona: Institut Català de les Dones. Retrieved January 05, 2019 from http://dones.gencat.cat/web/.content/03_ambits/docs/publicacions_eines01.pdf [134] [e]
Gertler, P.J., Martínez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L.B. & Vermeersch, C.M.J. (2017). La evaluación de impacto en la práctica. Segunda edición. Washington, DC: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Banco Mundial. Retrieved February 27, 2018 from https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/La-evaluaci%C3%B3n-de-impacto-en-la-pr%C3%A1ctica-Segunda-edici%C3%B3n.pdf [142] [e]
Gobierno Vasco (2016). Modelo para la evaluación de processos participativos en las Administraciones Públicas. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Gobierno Vasco. Retrieved December 07, 2018 from http://www.gardena.euskadi.eus/evaluacion_participacion/ [131]
[133]
[e]
Goulden, A. & Kattel, R. (2022). Designing and implementing mission-oriented policies: Tools and resources from the field. London: UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Retrieved April 26, 2024 from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/publications/2024/feb/designing-and-implementing-mission-oriented-policies [152] [e]
Grantcraft (2006). Mapping Change. Using a Theory of Change to Guide Planning and Evaluation. New York: Grantcraft. Retrieved December 03, 2018 from http://www.grantcraft.org/assets/content/resources/theory_change.pdf [152] [e]
Grau Creus, M. (Coord.) (2003). Anàlisi de polítiques públiques. Barcelona: UOC. Retrieved April 11, 2021 from http://hdl.handle.net/10609/52482 [e]
International Development Research Center (2017). The Research Quality Plus (RQ+) assessment instrument. Ottawa: IDRC. Retrieved December 06, 2018 from https://www.idrc.ca/sites/default/files/sp/Documents%20EN/idrc_rq_assessment_instrument_september_2017.pdf [152] [e]
Jones, M.R. & Karsten, H. (2008). “Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research”. In
MIS Quarterly, 32 (1), 127-157. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. [111]
[116]
[122]
[e]
Kelly, B. (2013). Using Social Media to Enhance Your Research Activities. Session at the annual conference of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) 2013. London: CETIS. Retrieved December 27, 2013 from http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/events/daad-conference-2013/ [e]
Kuga Thas, A.M., Garcia Ramilo, C. & Cinco, C. (2007). Gender and ICT. Bangkok: UNDP-APDIP. Retrieved March 28, 2010 from http://www.apdip.net/publications/iespprimers/eprimer-gender.pdf [e]
Lawrence, M. & Shipman, M. (2024). Positive Pathways through Polycrisis. Victoria: Cascade institute. Retrieved July 06, 2024 from https://wfabhmdrpib5-u5525.pressidiumcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Positive-Pathways-Report-June-27-2024.pdf [e]
Martínez García, P. & Aguado Peláez, D. (2024). Qualitat democràtica i participació ciutadana. Guia d'eines per a l'avaluació d'experiències participatives. Col·lecció Eines, Sèrie Administració local, 13. Barcelona: Diputació de Barcelona. Retrieved July 06, 2024 from https://llibreria.diba.cat/cat/unclick/descargaebook.php?uid=7DC34BD15002AE3E6B02915DCA6637477406C9C73BFC64229B1170A1D9990ED9&c=70099&m=descarga [133] [e]
Mazzucato, M. (2017). Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Working Paper Series (IIPP WP 2017-01). London: UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Retrieved November 24, 2023 from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2017-01 [152] [e]
McLean, R., Ofir, Z., Etherington, A., Acevedo, M. & Feinstein, O. (2022). RQ+. Research Quality Plus. Evaluating Research Differently. Ottawa: IDRC. Retrieved April 25, 2022 from https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/60945/IDL-60945.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y [152] [e]
McLean, R. & Gargani, J. (2021). Scaling Impact: Innovation for the Public Good. Ottawa: Routledge, IDRC. Retrieved April 28, 2021 from https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/scaling-impact-innovation-public-good [e]
Ministerio de Hacienda y Administraciones Públicas (2009). Guía Metodológica para la elaboración de la Memoria del Análisis de impacto Normativo. Madrid: Ministerio de Hacienda. Retrieved January 05, 2019 from http://www.hacienda.gob.es/AreasTematicas/Gobernanza/simplifica/guia_metodologica_ain.pdf [142] [e]
Minocha, S. & Petre, M. (2012). Handbook of social media for researchers and supervisors. Digital technologies for research dialogues. London: Vitae, Open University. Retrieved May 27, 2013 from http://www.vitae.ac.uk/CMS/files/upload/Vitae_Innovate_Open_University_Social_Media_Handbook_2012.pdf [e]
Monteiro, B. & Dal Borgo, R. (2023). Supporting decision making with strategic foresight: An emerging framework for proactive and prospective governments. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 63. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved April 23, 2024 from https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/1d78c791-en [152] [e]
Muir, K. & Bennett, S. (2014). The Compass: Your guide to social impact measurement. Sydney: The Centre for Social Impact. Retrieved September 11, 2021 from https://www.csi.edu.au/media/uploads/CSI_The_Compass.pdf [e]
Mulgan, G. (2024). Evidence Ecosystems and the Challenge of Humanising and Normalising Evidence. London: IPPO. Retrieved April 14, 2024 from https://theippo.co.uk/evidence-ecosystems-and-the-challenge-of-humanising-and-normalising-evidence [e]
Nesta (2016). UK Evidence Ecosystem for Social Policy. February 2016. London: Nesta. Retrieved October 16, 2021 from https://evaluationsupportscotland.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Alliance_info_graphic5.pdf [144]
[147]
[150]
[152]
[e]
Noveck, B.S. (2021). Solving public problems. A practical guide to fix our government and change our world. New Haven: Yale University Press. [e]
ODI (2012). RAPID Outcome Assessment. London: ODI. Retrieved June 25, 2023 from https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/7815.pdf [e]
OECD (2020). Addressing societal challenges using transdisciplinary research. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 88. Paris: OECD Publishing. [100] [e]
OECD (2020). Improving Governance with Policy Evaluation. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved June 18, 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1787/89b1577d-en [150]
[152]
[e]
OECD (2020). The design and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies. A new systemic policy approach to address societal challenges. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 100. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved March 26, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1787/23074957 [152] [e]
Ofir, Z., Schwandt, T., Duggan, C. & McLean, R. (2016). RQ+. Research Quality Plus. A Holistic Approach to Evaluating Research. Ottawa: IDRC. Retrieved December 06, 2018 from https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/56528/IDL-56528.pdf [152] [e]
Oms, M. & Ramos, X. (2013). Planificació i avaluació d'un projecte. Unitat didàctica del Curs de Polítiques de Joventut de 2013. Revisió del document: gener de 2020. Barcelona: Agència Catalana de Joventut. Retrieved April 29, 2021 from http://ejoventut.gencat.cat/web/.content/e-joventut/recursos/tipus_de_recurs/documentacio/arxiu/UD_PLANIF-I-AVAL-DE-PROJECTE.pdf [142] [e]
Paic, A. (2021). Open Science - Enabling Discovery in the Digital Age. Digital Toolkit Note, No. 13. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved September 03, 2021 from https://goingdigital.oecd.org/data/toolkitnotes/No13_ToolkitNote_OpenScience.pdf [e]
Parera, M.A. (2009). Avaluació econòmica. Guia pràctica 6. Col·lecció Ivàlua de guies pràctiques sobre avaluació de polítiques públiques. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved February 27, 2018 from https://www.ivalua.cat/documents/1/01_03_2010_11_34_10_Guia6_Economica_Octubre2009_revfeb2010_massavermella.pdf [142] [e]
Pastor, X. & Caicedo, C. (2015). ¿Cómo elaborar un trabajo final de máster?. Barcelona: Editorial UOC. [e]
Peach, K., Berditchevskaia, A. & Bass, T. (2020). Collective Intelligence Design Playbook. (beta). London: Nesta. Retrieved January 13, 2023 from https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Nesta_Playbook_001_Web.pdf [143]
[152]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2020). “A Theory of Change of citizen participation: an update”. In
ICTlogy, February 2020, (197). Barcelona: ICTlogy. Retrieved February 28, 2020 from http://ictlogy.net/review/?p=4727 [e]
Peña-López, I. (2024). Ciencia ciudadana: por qué ciudadana y cómo y quién impulsarla desde lo público. Programa formativo de ciencia ciudadana 2024, 15 de marzo de 2024. Granada: Medialab UGR Universidad de Granada. Retrieved March 15, 2024 from http://ictlogy.net/presentations/20240315_ismael_pena-lopez_-_ciencia_ciudadana_desde_lo_publico.pdf [e]
Peña-López, I. (2024). Formación para desarrollar la organización: entornos complejos, personas abiertas. Share4Value: Universidades Corporativas, 18 de abril de 2024. Châteauform’ Campus La Mola: Cegos, Repsol, Châteauform. Retrieved April 18, 2024 from http://ictlogy.net/presentations/20240418_ismael_pena-lopez_-_formacion_desarrollar_organizacion_entornos_complejos_personas_abiertas.pdf [e]
Popper, R. (2008). “How are foresight methods selected?”. In
Foresight, 10 (6), 62-89. Bradford: Emerald. Retrieved January 08, 2022 from https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680810918586 [e]
Ramia, I., Powell, A., Stratton, K., Stokes, C., Meltzer, A. & Muir, K. (2021). Roadmap to social impact: Your step-by-step guide to planning, measuring and communicating social impact. Sydney: The Centre for Social Impact. Retrieved September 11, 2021 from https://www.csi.edu.au/media/uploads/csi_roadmap_to_social_impact.pdf [152] [e]
Ramos, J., Sweeney, J.A., Peach, K. & Smith, L. (2020). Our futures: by the people, for the people. How mass involvement in shaping the future can solve complex problems. London: Nesta. Retrieved July 08, 2020 from https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Our_futures_by_the_people_for_the_people_WEB_v5.pdf [143]
[152]
[e]
Ravetz, J.R. (1999). “What is Post-Normal Science”. In
Futures, 31 (7), 647-653. London: Elsevier. Retrieved May 05, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00024-5 [152] [e]
Research Evaluation . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved June 25, 2023 from https://academic.oup.com/rev [e]
Retolaza Eguren, Í. (2010). Teoría del cambio. Un enfoque de pensamiento-acción para navegar en la complejidad de los procesos de cambio social. Guatemala: PNUD/Hivos. [e]
Rey, A. (2019). InnoBox Plus. Sevilla: Confederación de Empresarios de Andalucía. Retrieved May 12, 2023 from https://innoboxplus.cea.es/ [143] [e]
Rodera Bermúdez, A.M. & González Ramos, A.M. (2014). “Tesis 2.0: Herramientas para su diseño, desarrollo, lectura y difusión”. In Romero Frías, E. & Sánchez González, M. (Eds.),
Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades Digitales: te?cnicas, herramientas y experiencias de e-Research e investigacio?n en colaboracio?n, Capítulo 11, 255-276. La Laguna: Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social. [e]
Rodríguez Moreno, M.L. & Llanes Ordóñez, J. (Coords.) (2013). Com elaborar, tutoritzar i avaluar un treball de fi de màster. Barcelona: AQU Catalunya. Retrieved March 09, 2017 from http://www.aqu.cat/doc/doc_26365669_1.pdf [e]
Rodríguez Moreno, M.L. & Llanes Ordóñez, J. (Coords.) (2013). Cómo elaborar, tutorizar y evaluar un Trabajo de Fin de Máster. Barcelona: AQU Catalunya. Retrieved March 09, 2017 from http://www.aqu.cat/doc/doc_18533565_1.pdf [e]
Rogers, P. (2014). La Teoría del Cambio. Síntesis metodológicas. Sinopsis de la evaluación de impacto nº2. Florencia: UNICEF. Retrieved May 03, 2018 from https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/Brief%202%20Theory%20of%20Change_ES.pdf [e]
Romero Frías, E. & Sánchez González, M. (Eds.) (2014). Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades Digitales: te?cnicas, herramientas y experiencias de e-Research e investigacio?n en colaboracio?n. La Laguna: Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social. Retrieved February 17, 2015 from http://www.cuadernosartesanos.org/2014/cac61.pdf [e]
Roselló Román, E. (2022). Cómo hacer futuros. Madrid: INTEF. Retrieved January 26, 2022 from https://laaventuradeaprender.intef.es/documents/10184/136635/87_RED_LADA_Cómo+hacer+futuros+R1.pdf [143] [e]
Ruiz, A., Casillas, C., Macía, M., Merino, M., Paja, M. & Rico, J. (2015). Guía práctica para el diseño y la realización de evaluaciones de políticas públicas. Enfoque AEVAL. Madrid: AEVAL. Retrieved February 27, 2018 from http://www.aeval.es/export/sites/aeval/comun/pdf/evaluaciones/Guia_Evaluaciones_AEVAL.pdf [142] [e]
Salamanca Tarazona, J.C. (2015). Políticas públicas: Diseño, implementación y evaluación. II Seminario Nacional de Actualización Académica. Bogotá: Centro de Estudios Fiscales. Retrieved September 18, 2018 from https://campusvirtual.contraloria.gov.co/campus/memorias/SemInvestiga/IISem_JuanCarlosSalamanca_Paper.pdf [142]
[147]
[e]
Saltelli, A. & Funtowicz, S. (2017). “What is science’s crisis really about?”. In
Futures, 91 (1), 5-11. London: Elsevier. Retrieved May 05, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.010 [152] [e]
Sauermann, H., Vohland, K., Antoniou, V., Balázs, B., Göbel, C., Karatzas, K., Mooney, P., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R. & Winter, S. (2020). “Citizen science and sustainability transitions”. In
Research Policy, 49 (5). London. Retrieved July 24, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103978 [e]
Schumann, A. (2016). Using Outcome Indicators to Improve Policies: Methods, Design Strategies and Implementation. OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2016/02. Paris: OECD. Retrieved May 06, 2024 from https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jm5cgr8j532-e [e]
Segeplán (2015). Guía para la formulación de políticas públicas. Guatemala: Segeplán. Retrieved November 28, 2018 from http://www.segeplan.gob.gt/downloads/2015/Politicas_Publicas/GpFPP.pdf [142] [e]
Segura, A., Farré Ribas, M. & Miras Llompart, J. (2020). Com puc incorporar els resultats d’una avaluació a la presa de decisions?. Eina pràctica 4.1.. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Retrieved October 10, 2021 from https://ivalua.cat/sites/default/files/2021-09/Toolkit_Eina%204.1.Incorporar_els_resultats_Def_0.pdf [133] [e]
Senabre, E. (2019). Co-creation for transdisciplinarity. Adoption of participatory design and agile project management in collaborative research processes. Barcelona: UOC-IN3. [e]
Síndic de Greuges de Catalunya (2021). Guia metodològica: valoració test sol·licitant ocult. Barcelona: Síndic de Greuges. Retrieved February 26, 2022 from https://www.sindic.cat/site/unitFiles/8036/guia_metodologica_tso.pdf [e]
Start, D. & Hovland, I. (2004). Tools for Policy Impact: A Handbook for Researchers. London: Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved January 05, 2019 from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/194.pdf [152] [e]
Stein, D. & Valters, C. (2012). Understanding Theory of Change in International Development. London: JSRP, The Asia Foundation. [152] [e]
Subirats, J. (1989). Análisis de Políticas Públicas y Eficacia de la Administración. Madrid: Ministerio de Administraciones Públicas. [e]
Taplin, D.H. & Clark, H. (2012). Theory of Change Basics. A primer on Theory of Change. New York: ActKnowledge. [e]
Tõnurist, P. & Hanson, A. (2020). Anticipatory innovation governance: Shaping the future through proactive policy making. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 44. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved April 23, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.1787/cce14d80-en [143]
[152]
[e]
Tree Bressen, K. (2006). Group facilitation primer. Chanchifin: Tree Bressen. Retrieved December 19, 2021 from https://effectivecollective.net/library/facilitation_primer.pdf [143] [e]
Turner, J.H. (1986). “The Theory of Structuration”. In
American Journal of Sociology, 91 (4), 969-977. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [111]
[116]
[122]
[e]
UK Government Office for Science (2023). An introductory systems thinking toolkit for civil servants. Updated 12 January 2023. London: Government of the UK. Retrieved September 08, 2023 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/systems-thinking-for-civil-servants/toolkit [131]
[152]
[e]
UK Government Office for Science (2011). Futures Toolkit: tools for strategic futures for policy-makers and analysts. London: Government of the UK. Retrieved August 26, 2021 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/674209/futures-toolkit-edition-1.pdf [143]
[152]
[e]
UK Government Office for Science (2023). Systems thinking case study bank. Updated 12 January 2023. London: Government of the UK. Retrieved September 08, 2023 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/systems-thinking-for-civil-servants/case-studies [131]
[152]
[e]
UK Government Office for Science (2022). Systems thinking: An Introductory Toolkit for Civil Servants. London: Government of the UK. Retrieved September 08, 2023 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6290d241d3bf7f036cb7a09f/GO-Science_Systems_Thinking_Toolkit_2022_v1.0.pdf [131]
[152]
[e]
UK Government Office for Science (2023). The civil servant's systems thinking journey. Updated 12 January 2023. London: Government of the UK. Retrieved September 08, 2023 from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/systems-thinking-for-civil-servants/journey [131]
[152]
[e]
UN Women (2014). Gender equality capacity assessment tool. New York: UN Women. Retrieved January 06, 2019 from http://www.unwomen.org/-/media/headquarters/attachments/sections/library/publications/2014/capacity assessmenttool_may2014_seconddraft pdf [134] [e]
UN Women (2015). Resources and Tools for Capacity Development on Gender Mainstreaming within the United Nations System. New York: UN Women. Retrieved January 06, 2019 from http://www.unwomen.org/-/media/headquarters/attachments/sections/how%20we%20work/unsystemcoordination/resources%20and%20tools%20for%20capacity%20development%20on%20gender%20mainstreaming%20within%20the%20un%20system.pdf?la=en&vs=1132 [134] [e]
UNDP & Agirre Lehendakaria Center (2023). Listening to the Present, Designining the Future: A Guide to Deep Listening. Bangkok: UNDP. Retrieved August 18, 2023 from https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2023-03/UNDP-RBAP-SIP-Deep-Listening-Guide-2023.pdf [152] [e]
UNDP (2014). Making Joint Gender Programmes Work. New York: UNDP. Retrieved January 06, 2019 from http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/womens-empowerment/making-joint-gender-programmes-work.html [134] [e]
UNDP (2006). Measuring Democratic Governance. A framework for selecting pro-poor and gender sensitive indicators. New York: UNDP. Retrieved December 08, 2018 from http://www.undp.org/content/dam/aplaws/publication/en/publications/democratic-governance/dg-publications-for-website/measuring-democratic-governance/Framework paper - entire paper.pdf [72]
[75]
[e]
UNDP (2023). Portfolio approach. Rethinking policy & development in times of uncertainty. Bangkok: UNDP. Retrieved September 07, 2023 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mOVog1-sNhb8OI1j2wffoDOCYYIdoI4G/view [152] [e]
UNDP (2022). System Change: A Guidebook for Adopting Portfolio Approaches. Bangkok: UNDP. Retrieved August 18, 2023 from https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2022-03/UNDP-RBAP-System-Change-A-Guidebook-for-Adopting-Portfolio-Approaches-2022.pdf [152] [e]
UNDP (2023). UNDP Portfolio Approach Competency Framework. Bangkok: UNDP. Retrieved August 18, 2023 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1epEJ29znNRVPYzyv7uHBINOrbJsmeEUa/view [152] [e]
UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence (2018). Foresight Manual. Empowered Futures for the 2030 Agenda. Singapore: UNDP. [143]
[152]
[e]
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (Ed.) (2015). Handbook on Measuring Equity in Education. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved April 11, 2018 from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/handbook-measuring-equity-education-2018-en.pdf [e]
Vilaseca Lázaro, D. (2022). L’ús de les dades obertes en la governança educativa. El quadre d’indicadors com a eina transformadora. Barcelona: Escola d'Administració Pública de Catalunya. [e]
Vogel, I. (2012). Review of the use of ‘Theory of Change’ in international development. London: DFID. Retrieved March 09, 2018 from http://www.theoryofchange.org/pdf/DFID_ToC_Review_VogelV7.pdf [152] [e]
W.K. Kellogg Foundation (2004). Logic Model Development Guide. East Battle Creek: W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Retrieved August 20, 2022 from https://wkkf.issuelab.org/resources/10124/10124.pdf [e]
Wittmann, F., Lindner, R., Hufnagl, M. & Roth, F. (2022). Mission-oriented innovation policy for transformative change. A toolbox for implementation and impact assessment. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems. Retrieved April 26, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.24406/publica-587 [152] [e]
Wittmann, F., Hummler, A., Posch, D. & Lindner, R. (2024). Missions with Impact. A practical guide to formulating effective missions. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems. Retrieved June 05, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.11585/2024034 [152] [e]
Warning: Undefined variable $name_contact_aux in /home/ismapi/ictlogy.net/bibliography/reports/types_categories.php on line 199
