Govern Obert de Badalona
Description:
Category Cloud (show/hide)
Bibliography for a/an: Compilation
Hide: yes ;
Public: yes
Year: 2016
Listing 49 references:
Almansa Morales, A. (2015). Transparencia y datos abiertos en la administración pública para el desarrollo territorial. Aplicaciones y oportunidades del Open Data en las administraciones públicas de España. Huelva: Universidad de Huelva. [106]
[116]
[e]
Anderson, M. (2016). Parents, Teens and Digital Monitoring. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved January 09, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/01/07/parents-teens-and-digital-monitoring/ [41]
[105]
[106]
[e]
Associació Catalana de Municipis i Comarques (2016). Guia de xarxes socials per a càrrecs electes i ens locals. Barcelona: ACM. Retrieved February 15, 2016 from http://www.acm.cat/redaccio/arxius/imatgesbutlleti/guiaXarxesSocials_ACM_2016_V1.pdf [106] [e]
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S. & Auer, S. (2015). “A systematic review of open government data initiatives”. In
Government Information Quarterly, Article in press, 32 (4), 399–418. London: Elsevier. [105]
[106]
[116]
[e]
Criado, J.I. & Ruvalcaba Gómez, E.A. (2016). ¿Qué es y qué se entiende por Gobierno Abierto? Análisis de la percepción e implementación del gobierno abierto en el ámbito local español. Colección NovaGob Academia nº1. Madrid: NovaGob. Retrieved January 11, 2017 from http://www.novagob.org/file/download/232094 [106] [e]
Criado, J.I., Pastor, V. & Villodre, J. (2017). Redes sociales digitales en los ayuntamientos españoles. Colección NovaGob Academia nº2. Madrid: NovaGob. Retrieved May 20, 2017 from https://lab.novagob.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Novagob_Academia_2_RRSS_Aytos_vFinal_20170516-ilovepdf-compressed.pdf [106] [e]
Criado, J.I. & Pastor, V. (2018). Gobierno Abierto. Guía didàctica. Bachillerato. Madrid: INTEF. Retrieved April 24, 2019 from http://transparencia.gob.es/transparencia/dam/jcr:30007c30-da81-4aff-9e74-79d029ccc7d4/Guia_GobAb_Bachillerato_vdef.pdf [106] [e]
Criado, J.I. & Pastor, V. (2018). Gobierno Abierto. Guía didàctica. Educación Primaria. Madrid: INTEF. Retrieved April 24, 2019 from http://transparencia.gob.es/transparencia/dam/jcr:debfee30-ae40-4135-860b-490613c4d89c/PRIMARIA_b_Coedición.pdf [106] [e]
Criado, J.I. & Pastor, V. (2018). Gobierno Abierto. Guía didàctica. Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Madrid: INTEF. Retrieved April 24, 2019 from http://transparencia.gob.es/transparencia/dam/jcr:41343eab-936f-4887-8d36-2be9414f7ee9/Guia_GobAb_Secundaria_Vdef.pdf [106] [e]
Dassen, N. & Cruz Vieyra, J. (Eds.) (2012). Open Government and Targeted Transparency. Trends and Challenges for Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Inter?American Development Bank. Retrieved November 09, 2012 from http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=37245826 [105]
[106]
[116]
[e]
Gandía, J.L., Marrahí, L. & Huguet, D. (2016). “Digital transparency and Web 2.0 in Spanish city councils”. In
Government Information Quarterly, 33 (1), 28-39. London: Elsevier. Retrieved March 14, 2016 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.12.004 [106] [e]
Generalitat de Catalunya (2017). Twitter Manual for Governments. Guidelines for public institutions based on the experience of the Government of Catalonia. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Retrieved May 15, 2017 from http://serveisdigitals.gencat.cat/web/.content/02_CATALEG_SERVEIS/xarxes-socials/Twitter-Manual-for-Governments.pdf [106] [e]
Generalitat de Catalunya (2018). Guia de visualització de dades. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Retrieved November 22, 2018 from http://atenciociutadana.gencat.cat/web/.content/manuals/guia-visualitzacio-dades.pdf [106] [e]
González-Zapata, F. & Heeks, R. (2015). “The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives”. In
Government Information Quarterly, 32 (42), 441-452. London: Elsevier. [105]
[106]
[116]
[e]
Gray, J. (2015). Democratising the Data Revolution. Cambridge: Open Knowledge. Retrieved November 13, 2015 from https://assets.okfn.org/files/reports/DemocratisingDataRevolution.pdf [106]
[116]
[e]
Gray, J., Lämmerhirt, D. & Bounegru, L. (2016). Changing What Counts: How Can Citizen-Generated and Civil Society Data Be Used as an Advocacy Tool to Change Official Data Collection?. Cambridge: Open Knowledge. Retrieved March 11, 2016 from http://civicus.org/thedatashift/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/changing-what-counts-2.pdf [106]
[116]
[e]
Horrigan, J.B. & Rainie, L. (2015). Americans' Views on Open Government Data. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved April 28, 2015 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/21/open-government-data/ [41]
[105]
[106]
[116]
[e]
Lämmerhirt, D., Rubinstein, I. & Montiel, Ó. (2017). The State of Open Government Data in 2017. Cambridge: Open Knowledge. Retrieved June 15, 2017 from https://blog.core.okfn.org/files/2017/06/FinalreportTheStateofOpenGovernmentDatain2017.pdf [106] [e]
Lathrop, D. & Ruma, L. (Eds.) (2010). Open Government; Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. Sebastopol: O’Reilly. [96]
[105]
[106]
[116]
[e]
Lourenço, R.P. (2015). “An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability”. In
Government Information Quarterly, 32 (3), 323–332. London: Elsevier. Retrieved August 07, 2015 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X15000660 [106]
[116]
[e]
Mergel, I. (2016). “A Framework for Interpreting Social Media Interactions in the Public Sector”. In
Government Information Quarterly, 30 (4), 327-334. London: Elsevier. Retrieved May 23, 2014 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X15300289 [106] [e]
OECD (2016). Open Government: The Global Context and the Way Forward. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved December 11, 2016 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264268104-en [106]
[116]
[e]
Osman, I., Anouze, A.L., Irani, Z., Al-Ayoubi, B., Lee, H., Balc?, A., Medeni, T. & Weerakkody, V. (2014). “COBRA framework to evaluate e-government services: A citizen-centric perspective”. In
Government Information Quarterly, 31 (2), 243-256. London: Elsevier. [106] [e]
Parés, M., Castellà Josa, C. & Garcia Brugada, M. (Coords.) (2015). Repensant la participació de la ciutadania al món local. Barcelona: Diputació de Barcelona. [106]
[131]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2011). “A hybrid model of direct-representative democracy”. In
ICTlogy, August 2011, (95). Barcelona: ICTlogy. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://ictlogy.net/review/?p=3812 [105]
[106]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2011). “Striving behind the shadow – The dawn of Spanish politics 2.0”. In van der Hof, S. & Groothuis, M. (Eds.),
Innovating Government. Normative, policy and technological dimensions of modern government, Chapter 8, 129-147. The Hague: TMC Asser Press. [57]
[67]
[85]
[87]
[105]
[106]
[107]
[111]
[115]
[120]
[121]
[122]
[139]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2012). “Ley de Transparencia: de la publicación de datos al trabajo en abierto”. In
Sociedad Red, 10 de abril de 2012. Barcelona: ICTlogy. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://ictlogy.net/sociedadred/?p=485 [105]
[106]
[111]
[115]
[120]
[121]
[125]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2013). “Democracia representativa, democracia directa o democracia líquida”. In
Sociedad Red, 9 de diciembre de 2013. Barcelona: Ictlogy. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://ictlogy.net/sociedadred/?p=737 [105]
[106]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2013). “La transparencia en pocas palabras”. In
Sociedad Red, 22 de abril de 2013. Barcelona: ICTlogy. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://ictlogy.net/sociedadred/?p=665 [105]
[106]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2014). “Breve análisis del Portal de Transparencia de la Generalitat de Catalunya”. In
Sociedad Red, 27 de enero de 2014. Barcelona: ICTlogy. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://ictlogy.net/sociedadred/?p=750 [105]
[106]
[111]
[115]
[120]
[121]
[125]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2014). “Breve análisis del Portal de Transparencia de la UGT de Catalunya”. In
Sociedad Red, 22 de diciembre de 2014. Barcelona: ICTlogy. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://ictlogy.net/sociedadred/?p=808 [105]
[106]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2014). “Casual politics: del clicktivismo a los movimientos emergentes y el reconocimiento de patrones”. In Cotarelo, R. & Olmeda, J.A. (Eds.),
La democracia del siglo XXI. Política, medios de comunicación, internet y redes sociales, Capítulo 10, 211-229. II Jornadas españolas de ciberpolítica, 28 de mayo de 2013. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales. Retrieved May 28, 2013 from http://ictlogy.net/articles/20130528_ismael_pena-lopez_-_casual_politics_clicktivismo_movimientos_emergentes_reconocimiento_patrones_(comunicacion).pdf [105]
[106]
[129]
[139]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2014). “Democracia líquida: contra la falsa disyuntiva de la democracia directa o la democracia representativa”. In
Sociedad Red, 10 de abril de 2014. Barcelona: Ictlogy. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://ictlogy.net/sociedadred/?p=762 [105]
[106]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2014). “Innovació social oberta: l’organització política com a plataforma”. In Costa i Fernández, L. & Puntí Brun, M. (Eds.),
Comunicació pel canvi social. Reflexions i experiències per una comunicació participativa, emancipadora i transparent, 59-75. Girona: Documenta Universitaria. [99]
[100]
[102]
[103]
[105]
[106]
[128]
[139]
[142]
[145]
[147]
[152]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2014). “Los datos no son de los gobiernos sino del ciudadano. Entrevista en Diari de Tarragona”. In
Sociedad Red, 8 de enero de 2014. Barcelona: Ismael Peña-López. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://ictlogy.net/sociedadred/?p=745 [105]
[106]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2014). “Qué es una agenda transparente en un político”. In
Sociedad Red, 14 de octubre de 2014. Barcelona: ICTlogy. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://ictlogy.net/sociedadred/?p=791 [105]
[106]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2014). “Sesión de trabajo sobre el Portal de Transparencia de la Generalitat de Catalunya”. In
Sociedad Red, 20 de enero de 2014. Barcelona: ICTlogy. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://ictlogy.net/sociedadred/?p=749 [105]
[106]
[111]
[115]
[120]
[121]
[125]
[e]
Peña-López, I., Congosto, M. & Aragón, P. (2014). “Spanish Indignados and the evolution of the 15M movement on Twitter: towards networked para-institutions”. In
Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 15 (1-2), 189-216. New York: Routledge. Retrieved August 24, 2014 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14636204.2014.931678 [96]
[100]
[105]
[106]
[111]
[115]
[120]
[121]
[122]
[127]
[e]
Peña-López, I. (2015). TIC al servei de la ciutadania. Diplomatura de Postgrau en lideratge i governança local. 10 de gener de 2015, Fundació Aula d'Alts Estudis d'Electes, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Barcelona: FAAEE. Retrieved January 10, 2015 from http://ictlogy.net/presentations/20150110_ismael_pena-lopez_-_tic_servei_ciutadania.zip [105]
[106]
[e]
Pina, V., Torres, L. & Royo, S. (2017). “Comparing online with offline citizen engagement for climate change: Findings from Austria, Germany and Spain”. In
Government Information Quarterly, 34 (1), 26-36. London: Elsevier. Retrieved March 20, 2017 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X16301496?dgcid=raven_sd_via_email [106] [e]
Porwol, L., Ojo, A. & Breslin, J.G. (2016). “An ontology for next generation e-Participation initiatives”. In
Government Information Quarterly, 33 (1). London: Elsevier. Retrieved February 26, 2016 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.007 [106]
[111]
[116]
[122]
[129]
[e]
Porwol, L., Ojo, A. & Breslin, J.G. (2018). “Social Software Infrastructure for e-Participation”. In
Government Information Quarterly, 35 (4), S88-S98. London: Elsevier. Retrieved February 27, 2016 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.002 [106]
[111]
[116]
[122]
[129]
[e]
Richards, R.C. (2016). Intersubjectively Relevant Information: An Account of Citizen-Centered Information and Communication in Democratic Deliberation About Ballot Initiatives. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University. [106] [e]
Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S. & Meijer, A.J. (2017). “Open data for democracy: Developing a theoretical framework for open data use”. In
Government Information Quarterly, 34 (1), 45–52. London: Elsevier. Retrieved January 11, 2017 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.01.001 [106]
[116]
[e]
Veljkovi?, N., Bogdanovi?-Dini?, S. & Stoimenov, L. (2014). “Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective”. In
Government Information Quarterly, 31 (2), 278–290. London: Elsevier. [105]
[106]
[116]
[e]
World Wide Web Foundation (2016). Open Data Barometer. ODB Global Report, Third Edition. Geneva: World Wide Web Foundation. Retrieved May 21, 2016 from http://opendatabarometer.org/doc/3rdEdition/ODB-3rdEdition-GlobalReport.pdf [106]
[116]
[e]
World Wide Web Foundation (2017). Open Data Barometer. ODB Global Report, Fourth Edition. Geneva: World Wide Web Foundation. Retrieved June 03, 2017 from http://opendatabarometer.org/doc/4thEdition/ODB-4thEdition-GlobalReport.pdf [106] [e]
Xarxa d'Innovació Pública (2014). 42 veus sobre el govern obert. Barcelona: Xarxa d'Innovació Pública. Retrieved April 10, 2014 from http://www.xarxaip.cat/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/42-veus1.pdf [106] [e]
Zubero, I. (Dir.) (2012). El Modelo Vasco de Open Government: Caracterización y Evaluación. Leioa: Civersity - EHU/UPV. Retrieved November 08, 2012 from http://www.irekia.euskadi.net/assets/a_documents/2632/caracterizacion_y_evaluacion_del_modelo_vog.pdf [105]
[106]
[e]
