TIES2012 (V). Betty Collis: Digital Learners: Will they surprise us?

Erectile dysfunction medicine natural erectile dysfunction treatments Low-Cost generic kamagra is impotence normal injections for erectile dysfunction define erectile dysfunction
By Ismael Peña-López (@ictlogist), 02 February 2012
Main categories: Education & e-Learning
Other tags: ,
1 Comment »

Notes from the III European Conference on Information Technology in Education and Society: A Critical Insight, in Barcelona, Spain, in January 1-3, 2012. More notes on this event under the tag ties2012.

Betty Collis
Digital Learners: Will they surprise us?

Home remedies for erectile dysfunction men's health cancer selenium percent body Acheter pas cher Viagra erectile dysfunction research do somas cause erectile dysfunction
At the level of the processes of learning, there already is taking place a revolution on how digital learners are facing their learning. They may also be doing things differently, or in different places, or with different tools, or with different people… just may. But what are the results of this revolution?

New learners are using multiple tools, analogue/traditional and digital altogether, mixing physical and virtual environments.

Partial impotence men's health diet no alcohol erectile dysfunction new jersey Kaufen Generika Kamagra Gold lexapro impotence
The tasks that are being performed in new environments are not that new: communicating, asking, discussing, sharing; capturing, labelling, storing; finding, adapting, expanding, creating; listening, watching, reading, annotating, writing. But these tasks are being performed with crucial differences: range, functionalities, fluidity, depth, etc. And learners are making most of these decisions by themselves, not because they were told to by their instructors.

Discount Levitra Soft prescription erectile dysfunction nervous erectile dysfunction erectile dysfunction diagnosis tests
So, we can state that digital learners are following new processes by applying old and new sets of tools, both of them used in different ways. But what about the results of their learning?

Natural cure erectile dysfunction foods to help erectile dysfunction drug caused impotence Kauf Kamagra Jelly

It just happens that the results we get from students are highly dependable from the way we assess their performance. If we want different results emerging from different learning processes, we do need to also change the ways with which we assess learning. Indeed, the new different assessment should go in the line of not providing the “right answer” to a given question coming from some learning material, but engaging the student to contribute with more material, with more relevant questions on the topic.

In fact, as technology becomes more and more social, learning is more about learning together, about building a learning community. Thus, assessment necessarily needs to target the creation of a learning community and how much and how well a student contributes to it.

And, as a part of the building of a learning community, an arrangement has to be made to create an “authentic audience” for the projects beyond the instructor and classmates, to get feedback from the representatives of the external audience and make results available.

Keys of expanded learning (previously not possible without technology):

  • Knowledge, insight to be demonstrated is specified but in the demonstration the learner has scope to surprise with results.
  • Learners make use of the skills they already have in the process of learning
  • The product fo the learning contributes tgo the learning of others.
  • The instructor leads a scaffolding process: guides, gives feedback, steers, and refers regularly to assessment rubrics so “surprised” does not mean the learner feels lost in terms of expectations.

Some bibliography:

III European Conference on Information Technology in Education and Society: A Critical Insight (2012)

If you need to cite this article in a formal way (i.e. for bibliographical purposes) I dare suggest:

Peña-López, I. (2012) “TIES2012 (V). Betty Collis: Digital Learners: Will they surprise us?” In ICTlogy, #101, February 2012. Barcelona: ICTlogy.
Retrieved month dd, yyyy from http://ictlogy.net/review/?p=3895

Previous post: TIES2012 (IV). Innovative uses of ICTs in teaching and learning processes

Next post: TIES2012 (VI). Punya Mishra: Creative Teaching with Technology: Introducing the TPACK Framework

1 Comment to “TIES2012 (V). Betty Collis: Digital Learners: Will they surprise us?” »

  1. Pingback: Medien | pädagogik | didaktik | bildung » Rückschau: TIES 2012

RSS feed RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Your comment:

Sobre Mi

    Sóc l'Ismael Peña-López.

    Sóc professor dels Estudis de Dret i de Ciència Política de la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, així com investigador a l'Internet Interdisciplinary Institute i l'eLearn Center de la mateixa. Des de novembre de 2013 estic a mitja jornada per a poder afegir-me a l’equip d’Open Evidence com a investigador i analista sènior. També dirigeixo el projecte d’Innovació Oberta de la Fundació Jaume Bofill.