The presentations of the Annual ICT4D Postgraduate Symposium are already online here http://www.gg.rhul.ac.uk/ict4d/sympapers.html.
[read at Peter’s Critical Technologist.]
Ismael Peña-López, lecturer and researcher
Information Society, Digital Divide, ICT4D
The presentations of the Annual ICT4D Postgraduate Symposium are already online here http://www.gg.rhul.ac.uk/ict4d/sympapers.html.
[read at Peter’s Critical Technologist.]
This is the Annual ICT4D Postgraduate Symposium closing plenary briefing. It took place in Egham, September 15th, 2006, evening. Here come the notes I took on the fly:
First of all, I was given the chance to present ICTlogy as my personal reseach portal in the field of ICT4D. Hope it was found useful for people to benefit from my previous (re)searches. I really encouraged people to contribute (are you reading this? ;)
Following, some of the attendants (representing working groups) presented the “solutions” these groups gave to some “frequenly asked questions” by researchers and PhD students, namely:
Then Tim Unwin presented some “Concluding Thoughts”.
Among the main commitments for the future, here come some:
Next appointments:
And of course all the presentations will be uploaded to the ICT4D Collective web page. Stay tuned!
This is the Annual ICT4D Postgraduate Symposium eight and last session briefing. It took place in Egham, September 15th, 2006, evening. Here come the notes I took on the fly:
Interactive Radio Instruction differs from traditional distance education — the primary goal is the improvement of educational quality. It is, indeed, a more constructivist model.
Learning at the Taonga Market (LTM) started by Ministry of Education of Zambia, consisting of 30 minute broadcasts.
The Freeplay Foundation designed the Lifeline Radio for the humanitarian sector, a radio that works with solar energy or can be powered manually through a lever.
Challenges:
Gives some examples of “Kachi Abadi” in Pakistan and their PCOs (Personal Call Offices).
Problem statement: “Technology is not for girls”.
She’s developed a handbook of the different models of telecenters (e-Choupal, Akshaya e-Kendras, e Seva, Cabinas Públicas, Telecottages, Gaseleka Telecenter, etc.) and she’s listed the services offered in each type of telecenter (Agriculture community access, training center, information kiosk, e-transaction, e-governance cell, etc.)
Having this categorization in mind, what happens with Women and ICT Centers? What’s the impact on women:
An urgent need to have:
Dealing how to use technologyh to improve ICT education and HIV/AIDS education/counseling in Tanzania and soon also in South Africa. Challenge: How can we contextualize ICT education and technology so the local community can fully take advantage of its opportunities and possibilities.
Main problems:
This is the Annual ICT4D Postgraduate Symposium seventh session briefing. It took place in Egham, September 15th, 2006, afternoon. Here come the notes I took on the fly:
[disclaimer: actually not a PhD research, but an ongoing project]
Just before starting the presentations, Gudrun presents The PhD Student Network in ICT for Developing Regions, also PID network. The network was created by Gudrun Wicandi herself and Annika Andersson, to foster networking among doctoral (and master) students in the field of ICT4D.
Once the network is set, a plan of activities will be launched to this community can share articles or pre-prints, meet, etc.
What’s the meaning of being literate today? There even is an agreement on how to measure literacy at all (digital or not).
The existence of means of communication creates a demand for them. The instruments of literacy create a demand for literacy
(Lewis, 1953)
Interaction [technology – human] Design examples:
Field work in Ethiopia, to gain insight in daily activities and necessary skills, rank them and see the familiarity with and importance of ICT. Then develop a possible scenario of ICT use.
Lifetime treatment (HIV is chronic) to suppress the virus’s action might generate a resistance in the virus, and (ongoing) treatment be a failure. Then the patient develops AIDS.
The main aim is to gather the (huge amount of already) collected data and see if these data can alert (thanks to a crossdata database) the patient from be developing self-resistance. Problem: data ownership and informed consent.
This is the Annual ICT4D Postgraduate Symposium sixth session briefing. It took place in Egham, September 15th, 2006, noon. Here come the notes I took on the fly:
What are the inhibiting and facilitating factors that can esplain inclusion and exclusion in ICT-based distance education in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh? To do so, create a model to explain inclusion and exclusion factors of e-learning in a developing country setting, and on basis of this model, develop inclusion strategies.
Scientific Thought is the common heritage of mankind
, Abdus Salam.
Marco starts his speech talking presenting ICTP, and their main projects such as PingEr and the book Wireless Networking in the Developing World.
The four technological requirements that can make an ICT4D project successful (The case for Technology in developing regions, E. Brewer):
Main challenges in deploying WSN in developing countries:
This is the Annual ICT4D Postgraduate Symposium fifth session briefing. It took place in Egham, September 15th, 2006, morning. Here come the notes I took on the fly:
Compare econometric methods of valuation, comparing the benefits of modern technology and methodology with the traditional valuation method in terms of relability and accuracy.
The hedonic pricing method places emphasis on property attributes and price per unit value.
The question is: are there any more attributes affecting the prices of lands in the study areas [besides the ones considered]?
Build an only digital index, different from the technology focused ones (i.e. ITU) or the ones that combine ICT indicators and development indicators (i.e. NRI).
The goal is try and stablish relationships among indicators (not just an index) so the conclusions can be used in ICT policy making.
[disclaimer: she’s the chief editor of Knowledge Management for Development Journal]
She explains the three main methods to measure the effect of knowledge sharing for development and, with the conclusions, work in the making of a (new) framework of analyse, taking the best of the three worlds (and own contribution ;) and being capable of doing impact assessment.
The main goal is go ahead the case-study or the particular-approach and try and set a general way of evaluating knowledge strategies. To do so, fieldwork in Uganda putting in practice the three methods, in order to be able to compare them.
The $1M questions: what is knowledge? what is effect? what is impact?