Works
Results for:
- “behavioural sciences” as tag
13 references:
American Behavioral Scientist . London: SAGE Publications. http://abs.sagepub.com/
Costas, E. & Ferrer Romero, C. (2022). El impacto de los trámites administrativos en el acceso a las prestaciones sociales. Una perspectiva conductual. Barcelona: Taula d'entitats del Tercer Sector Social de Catalunya, KSNET. Retrieved June 10, 2022 from https://www.ksnet.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Infome_Impacto-tramites-administrativos_ESP.pdf
De Quintana Medina, J. (2021). Acceptability of nudges as public policy tools: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Barcelona: UAB. Retrieved December 28, 2021 from https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/671907/jdqm1de1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Hallsworth, M., Egan, M., Rutter, J. & McCrae, J. (2018). Behavioural Government. Using behavioural science to improve how governments make decisions. London: The Behavioural Insights Team. Retrieved August 15, 2018 from https://38r8om2xjhhl25mw24492dir-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/BIT-Behavioural-Government-Report.pdf
Hattke, F. & Kalucza, J. (2019). “What influences the willingness of citizens to coproduce public services? Results from a vignette experiment”. In
Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2 (1), 1-14. Newark: Rutgers University-Newark. Retrieved March 08, 2019 from https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.21.60
Journal of Behavioral Public Administration . Newark: Rutgers University-Newark. Retrieved August 20, 2019 from https://journal-bpa.org
Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Gaskell, G., Tornese, P., Vila, J., Gómez, Y., Allen, A., Veltri, G. & Codagnone, C. (2018). Behavioural study on the transparency of online platforms. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved April 16, 2018 from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/transparency_of_platforms-study-final-report_en.pdf
Mair, D., Smillie, L., La Placa, G., Schwendinger, F., Pasztor, Z. & van Bavel, R. (2019). Understanding our Political Nature: How to put knowledge and reason at the heart of political decision-making. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved March 01, 2021 from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC117161/understanding-our-political-nature.pdf
Neuert, H., Fischer, E., Darling, M. & Barrows, A. (2019). Work requirements don't work. A behavioral science perspective. New York: ideas42. Retrieved April 05, 2019 from http://www.ideas42.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ideas42-Work-Requirements-Paper.pdf
OECD (2021). Behavioural Insights for Better Tax Administration: A Brief Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved February 26, 2023 from https://www.oecd.org/tax/forum-on-tax-administration/publications-and-products/behavioural-insights-for-better-tax-administration-a-brief-guide.pdf
Ponce Solé, J. (2021). Behavioural Insights, Law and Good Administration: Nudging and the Covid-19 Pandemic. EGPL workshop 2021. [mimeo].
Schwendinger, F., Topp, L. & Kovacs, V. (2022). Competences for Policymaking — Competence Frameworks for Policymakers and Researchers working on Public Policy. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved December 11, 2024 from http://doi.org/10.2760/642121
Sunstein, C.R. (2016). “People Prefer System 2 Nudges (Kind Of)”. In
Duke Law Journal, 66 (1), 121-168. Durham: Duke University School of Law. Retrieved August 01, 2019 from http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol66/iss1/3
