<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing the Hybrid Institutional-Personal Learning Environment (HIPLE)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ictlogy.net/20100609-introducing-the-hybrid-institutional-personal-learning-environment-hiple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ictlogy.net/20100609-introducing-the-hybrid-institutional-personal-learning-environment-hiple/</link>
	<description>Information Society, Digital Divide, ICT4D</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:20:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLE_BCN Conference &#8211; Day 1 &#171; Mediendidaktik 2.0</title>
		<link>http://ictlogy.net/20100609-introducing-the-hybrid-institutional-personal-learning-environment-hiple/comment-page-1/#comment-125313</link>
		<dc:creator>PLE_BCN Conference &#8211; Day 1 &#171; Mediendidaktik 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ictlogy.net/?p=3389#comment-125313</guid>
		<description>[...] came up with an acronym iPLE to name insitutionalised PLEs. Someone suggested contrasting PLEs with HPLE &#8211; hybrid PLEs. Some people say institutionalised PLEs may be an oxymoron, some propose to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] came up with an acronym iPLE to name insitutionalised PLEs. Someone suggested contrasting PLEs with HPLE &#8211; hybrid PLEs. Some people say institutionalised PLEs may be an oxymoron, some propose to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perspectivas y focalizaciones de los entornos personales de aprendizaje &#124; Fernando Santamaría</title>
		<link>http://ictlogy.net/20100609-introducing-the-hybrid-institutional-personal-learning-environment-hiple/comment-page-1/#comment-123955</link>
		<dc:creator>Perspectivas y focalizaciones de los entornos personales de aprendizaje &#124; Fernando Santamaría</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ictlogy.net/?p=3389#comment-123955</guid>
		<description>[...] Interface de servicios de redes XML, JSON, Mashups, APIs, &#8230;) Como comenta Ismael Peña en un reciente post, se debe abogar por una equidistancia y eclecticismo para afrontar &#8220;conjugaciones&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interface de servicios de redes XML, JSON, Mashups, APIs, &#8230;) Como comenta Ismael Peña en un reciente post, se debe abogar por una equidistancia y eclecticismo para afrontar &#8220;conjugaciones&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Peña-López</title>
		<link>http://ictlogy.net/20100609-introducing-the-hybrid-institutional-personal-learning-environment-hiple/comment-page-1/#comment-123309</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Peña-López</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 05:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ictlogy.net/?p=3389#comment-123309</guid>
		<description>I think that institutions will gradually move in two (apparently) opposite ways: let the softcore activity move outside of campuses by using web 2.0 apps, and lock in hardcore activity and private data in their own platforms/servers.

If some things don&#039;t &lt;em&gt;radically&lt;/em&gt; change about data ownership, data portability, privacy and security in web 2.0 services (not only Facebook and Google, but many others &#8212; and this seems unlikely right now), I would expect to see a round trip in institutions moving to third party&#039;s services and then back home to secure what is sensitive and core data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that institutions will gradually move in two (apparently) opposite ways: let the softcore activity move outside of campuses by using web 2.0 apps, and lock in hardcore activity and private data in their own platforms/servers.</p>
<p>If some things don&#8217;t <em>radically</em> change about data ownership, data portability, privacy and security in web 2.0 services (not only Facebook and Google, but many others &mdash; and this seems unlikely right now), I would expect to see a round trip in institutions moving to third party&#8217;s services and then back home to secure what is sensitive and core data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skip Via</title>
		<link>http://ictlogy.net/20100609-introducing-the-hybrid-institutional-personal-learning-environment-hiple/comment-page-1/#comment-123296</link>
		<dc:creator>Skip Via</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ictlogy.net/?p=3389#comment-123296</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see this concept adopted by Blackboard and other CMS providers. I have been moving away from BB due to the vertical constraints imposed (blogged on this at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.skipvia.com/blog/?p=199&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.skipvia.com/blog/?p=199&lt;/a&gt;) and toward open tools such as Google Sites portfolios, wikis, etc. but keep BB largely for the online gradebook and integration with Elluminate. The level of integration and interoperability that you suggest would be most welcome. I hope we see some progress toward this idea in the near future.

To be honest, I&#039;d drop BB entirely if there were tools to easily deliver private data (e.g., grades) to students through open tools such as Google Sites. Plugins, anyone?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see this concept adopted by Blackboard and other CMS providers. I have been moving away from BB due to the vertical constraints imposed (blogged on this at <a href="http://www.skipvia.com/blog/?p=199" rel="nofollow">http://www.skipvia.com/blog/?p=199</a>) and toward open tools such as Google Sites portfolios, wikis, etc. but keep BB largely for the online gradebook and integration with Elluminate. The level of integration and interoperability that you suggest would be most welcome. I hope we see some progress toward this idea in the near future.</p>
<p>To be honest, I&#8217;d drop BB entirely if there were tools to easily deliver private data (e.g., grades) to students through open tools such as Google Sites. Plugins, anyone?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

