<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs for e-Government: sufficient condition, but not necessary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ictlogy.net/20080518-blogs-for-e-government-sufficient-condition-but-not-necessary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ictlogy.net/20080518-blogs-for-e-government-sufficient-condition-but-not-necessary/</link>
	<description>Information Society, Digital Divide, ICT4D</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Peña-López</title>
		<link>http://ictlogy.net/20080518-blogs-for-e-government-sufficient-condition-but-not-necessary/comment-page-1/#comment-65386</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Peña-López</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 13:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ictlogy.net/?p=731#comment-65386</guid>
		<description>Right, there are non-democratic countries with increasing blog use... but ain&#039;t this a signal that there are some inner democratic preasures towards a normalization of political freedom?

On the other hand, we should surely be talking about &quot;real&quot; or &quot;effective&quot; blogging, however we define and measure it. The concept being that blogs that are blocked or are self-censored, for instance, should not count as actual blogging, at least not as proxies for freedom of speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, there are non-democratic countries with increasing blog use&#8230; but ain&#8217;t this a signal that there are some inner democratic preasures towards a normalization of political freedom?</p>
<p>On the other hand, we should surely be talking about &#8220;real&#8221; or &#8220;effective&#8221; blogging, however we define and measure it. The concept being that blogs that are blocked or are self-censored, for instance, should not count as actual blogging, at least not as proxies for freedom of speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Víctor R. Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://ictlogy.net/20080518-blogs-for-e-government-sufficient-condition-but-not-necessary/comment-page-1/#comment-65385</link>
		<dc:creator>Víctor R. Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ictlogy.net/?p=731#comment-65385</guid>
		<description>Hi, thanks for the answer. I wondered whether the non-existence of the relationsip was actually good news. It could mean some non-developed/non-democratic countries are also using blogs. And there are good examples of that, like China and Iran. However, we cannot be positive that blog use foster democracy. Iran has had a big blogosphere for years, but political changes and freedom aren&#039;t following.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, thanks for the answer. I wondered whether the non-existence of the relationsip was actually good news. It could mean some non-developed/non-democratic countries are also using blogs. And there are good examples of that, like China and Iran. However, we cannot be positive that blog use foster democracy. Iran has had a big blogosphere for years, but political changes and freedom aren&#8217;t following.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
