<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: e-STAS 2008 (V). Workshop: web programmes and content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ictlogy.net/20080424-e-stas-2008-workshop-web-programmes-and-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ictlogy.net/20080424-e-stas-2008-workshop-web-programmes-and-content/</link>
	<description>Information Society, Digital Divide, ICT4D</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:20:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: César</title>
		<link>http://ictlogy.net/20080424-e-stas-2008-workshop-web-programmes-and-content/comment-page-1/#comment-64850</link>
		<dc:creator>César</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ictlogy.net/?p=710#comment-64850</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;m a natural born pessimistic, but I couldn&#039;t agree less. For me, best starting point for &#039;social action&#039; is a sustainable business model.

In some cases that business model is based on state money, some other times on foundations... and sometimes (TV is a VERY sucessful example, Google an even better one) it is funded on, not your perceived clients (TV viewers, web visitors), but on &quot;selling eyeballs&quot;. Yes, even for an &lt;strong&gt;extremely&lt;/strong&gt; low income public: one of the advantages of digitalization is that replication and distribution costs are so low that even very low income on advertising can help turn a profit. I&#039;m not a great fan of Chris Anderson&#039;s &#039;free&#039; idea, but I&#039;d make it compulsory studying for anyone working in this field.

You can trust human good will or human greed. I know where I am laying my bets...

I&#039;m more than willing to be flamed because of my lack of trust in mankind, and really sorry to rain on the parade but, at the very least, I think some counterpoint was needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m a natural born pessimistic, but I couldn&#8217;t agree less. For me, best starting point for &#8216;social action&#8217; is a sustainable business model.</p>
<p>In some cases that business model is based on state money, some other times on foundations&#8230; and sometimes (TV is a VERY sucessful example, Google an even better one) it is funded on, not your perceived clients (TV viewers, web visitors), but on &#8220;selling eyeballs&#8221;. Yes, even for an <strong>extremely</strong> low income public: one of the advantages of digitalization is that replication and distribution costs are so low that even very low income on advertising can help turn a profit. I&#8217;m not a great fan of Chris Anderson&#8217;s &#8216;free&#8217; idea, but I&#8217;d make it compulsory studying for anyone working in this field.</p>
<p>You can trust human good will or human greed. I know where I am laying my bets&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m more than willing to be flamed because of my lack of trust in mankind, and really sorry to rain on the parade but, at the very least, I think some counterpoint was needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

