<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skills of an expert knower 2.0/leaner 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ictlogy.net/20071107-skills-of-an-expert-knower-20leaner-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ictlogy.net/20071107-skills-of-an-expert-knower-20leaner-20/</link>
	<description>Information Society, Digital Divide, ICT4D</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:25:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Peña-López</title>
		<link>http://ictlogy.net/20071107-skills-of-an-expert-knower-20leaner-20/comment-page-1/#comment-44423</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Peña-López</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ictlogy.net/20071107-skills-of-an-expert-knower-20leaner-20/#comment-44423</guid>
		<description>Sad but true...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad but true&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva</title>
		<link>http://ictlogy.net/20071107-skills-of-an-expert-knower-20leaner-20/comment-page-1/#comment-44363</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ictlogy.net/20071107-skills-of-an-expert-knower-20leaner-20/#comment-44363</guid>
		<description>Congratulations for the post. I think it is a great reflection that opens many research questions or hypothesis to contrast.  I guess that everyone would like to be 2.0 but...we shouldn&#039;t forget, as it is showed by most of the surveys, the world is still between 0.0 and 1.0. So if we try to ask questions about 2.0 we will probably have to use 1.0 terms to be understood.

A year I ago I did different surveys to different healthcare professionals where, after the some trials, I couldn&#039;t include the web 2.0 term because most of the professionals, even the youngest, did not know anything about this or about open movement... Furthermore the results show us health is still 1.0... Don&#039;t you think It would be the same in Education if we would choose a representative sample of students or teachers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations for the post. I think it is a great reflection that opens many research questions or hypothesis to contrast.  I guess that everyone would like to be 2.0 but&#8230;we shouldn&#8217;t forget, as it is showed by most of the surveys, the world is still between 0.0 and 1.0. So if we try to ask questions about 2.0 we will probably have to use 1.0 terms to be understood.</p>
<p>A year I ago I did different surveys to different healthcare professionals where, after the some trials, I couldn&#8217;t include the web 2.0 term because most of the professionals, even the youngest, did not know anything about this or about open movement&#8230; Furthermore the results show us health is still 1.0&#8230; Don&#8217;t you think It would be the same in Education if we would choose a representative sample of students or teachers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabetta Cigognini</title>
		<link>http://ictlogy.net/20071107-skills-of-an-expert-knower-20leaner-20/comment-page-1/#comment-43335</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabetta Cigognini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ictlogy.net/20071107-skills-of-an-expert-knower-20leaner-20/#comment-43335</guid>
		<description>Grazie!
thanks for your very interesting thoughts and your celerity in aswering !:-)
your vision of three caterorization (technical skills, philosophical approach and psycological-social aspects) is close to our multi-levels skills view, but is very likely to provoke us in a very interesting way!!. At the end of our research we will send you our results and we will acknowledge your participation as expert.
thank you, write you soon

eli and mc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grazie!<br />
thanks for your very interesting thoughts and your celerity in aswering !:-)<br />
your vision of three caterorization (technical skills, philosophical approach and psycological-social aspects) is close to our multi-levels skills view, but is very likely to provoke us in a very interesting way!!. At the end of our research we will send you our results and we will acknowledge your participation as expert.<br />
thank you, write you soon</p>
<p>eli and mc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

